But then we have the latest Scottish Government budget. I'm going to focus on Chapter 9.
There are three budget lines that relate to Active Travel:
- Sustainable and Active Travel (SAT)
- Cycling, Walking and Safer Routes (CWSR)
- Future Travel Fund (FTF)
'The budget for Sustainable and Active Travel delivers support for the promotion of more sustainable travel choices, including support for the actions in the Cycling Action Plan for Scotland as well as work to promote sustainable transport to organisations and in communities, e.g. the development of a network of car clubs across Scotland. It includes funding for the core Fastlink scheme in Glasgow (£20 million in 2013-14 and £10 million in 2014-15).'
Cycling Walking and Safer Routes is money given to local authorities. They choose how much to spend on such and how much goes directly into cycling and walking and how much is used, under the guise of safer routes for e.g. 20mph limit in urban areas. Some local authorities all money to this fund - but for many this is the only walking and cycling budget.
'The Future Transport Fund will reduce the impact of transport on our environment, reducing congestion and supporting better public transport, active travel and low carbon vehicles. This investment provides a platform for increasing support thereafter for a range of sustainable transport initiatives, including cycling infrastructure and freight modal shift.'
So it takes a bit of effort working outwhat is the real figure for walking and cycling.
(figure in £ millions) 2013-14 2014-15 Draft 2015-16 Plan
Sustrainable and Active Travel 35 29 15
Cycling Walking and Safer Routes 5.6 8.2 8
Future Travel Fund 7.7 18.7 20.2
Total 48.3 55.9 43.2
but there are some things in this mix that have nothing do do with walking and cycling
Fastlink Bus route, Glasgow 20 10 0
Electric car charging points 5 5 5
Car clubs 2 2 2
Total 27 17 7
so available might be:
Real figure for walking and cycling 21.3 38.9 36.2
For a country of 5.3m people and with a £2 billion (£2,000,000,000) transport budget, this is paltry - especially with an aspiration for 10% journeys to be by bike by 2020.
Post a Comment
I am happy to address most contributions if they are coherent. Comments with a constructive contribution to make to the discussion, even if it is critical will be posted.
Please do not add comments in the name of real people unless you are that person.
The views expressed in comments are those of the poster, not me.